Williams v. Macomb Correctional Facility et al
ORDER Denying Without Prejudice 13 Motion for Extension of Time and 16 Motion Regarding Time Limit for Service. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
Case 4:20-cv-10584-MFL-MJH ECF No. 22, PageID.169 Filed 02/18/21 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Case No. 20-cv-10584
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman
FACILITY, et al.,
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF No. 13) AND MOTION REGARDING
TIME LIMIT FOR SERVICE (ECF No. 16)
Plaintiff Maurice Williams filed this pro se prisoner’s civil rights action
against the Macomb Correctional Facility and Nobert Fronczak. After filing the
action, Williams filed two pro se motions: a motion for extension of time and a
motion regarding time limit for service. The Court has now appointed counsel for
Williams. The Court believes that the best course of action going forward is to have
counsel conduct an independent review of the entire case and to determine the
appropriate next steps, including whether the issues raised in the motions should be
pursued. At this time, the Court will DENY the motions without prejudice. Counsel
Case 4:20-cv-10584-MFL-MJH ECF No. 22, PageID.170 Filed 02/18/21 Page 2 of 2
may re-file the motions (in the form prescribed by the Court’s Local Rules), if he
deems it necessary and appropriate to do so after completing his review.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: February 18, 2021
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the
parties and/or counsel of record on February 18, 2021, by electronic means and/or
s/ Holly A. Monda
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?