Cross v. Wayne County Corporation et al

Filing 29

ORDER Adopting 28 Report and Recommendation on 21 Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss filed by Yvonne Cross, and 17 Motion to Dismiss filed by Jolynn Stokes and 14 Motion to Dismiss filed by Judy Hartsfield. Signed by District Judge Shalina D. Kumar. (THal)

Download PDF
Case 4:22-cv-11705-SDK-CI ECF No. 29, PageID.270 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION YVONNE CROSS, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE JUDY HARTSFIELD et al., Defendants. Case No. 22-11705 Honorable Shalina D. Kumar Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 28) ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS (ECF NO. 21) AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 14, 17) Plaintiff Yvonne Cross filed this action without assistance of counsel. ECF No. 1. This case was referred to the magistrate judge for all pretrial matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b). ECF No. 6. Defendants filed motions to dismiss. ECF Nos. 14, 17. Cross did not oppose defendants’ motions and instead filed her own motion to voluntarily dismiss. ECF No. 21. On October 12, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”). ECF No. 28. The R&R recommends that the Court treat Cross’s motion as a notice of voluntary dismissal and suggests that the notice be accepted because no answer or motion for Page 1 of 2 Case 4:22-cv-11705-SDK-CI ECF No. 29, PageID.271 Filed 01/17/23 Page 2 of 2 summary judgment was filed. Id. No party has filed an objection to the R&R. The Court has reviewed the record and ADOPTS the R&R relative to Cross’s motion. Cross’s motion (ECF No. 21) is deemed a notice of voluntary dismissal, defendants’ motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 14, 17) are thus TERMINATED as moot, and the case is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 17, 2023 s/Shalina D. Kumar SHALINA D. KUMAR United States District Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?