Varner v. Department of Veteran Affairs, Secretary of

Filing 7

ORDER denying 6 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION EUNICE L. VARNER, Plaintiff, v. R. JAMES NICHOLSON, Secretary of Department of Veterans Affairs Agency, Defendant. / ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Plaintiff Eunice L. Varner filed this complaint October 19, 2007. The court dismissed the complaint July 29, 2008, finding that the parties to the case and the issues presented were identical to a previously filed companion case, Case No. 07-10211. On August 4, 2008, plaintiff Varner filed this motion for reconsideration of the order of dismissal. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(g)(2), no response was filed and no oral argument was heard. Generally, and without restricting the court's discretion, the court will not grant motions for rehearing or reconsideration that merely present the same issues ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication. The movant must not only demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties have been misled but also show that correcting the defect will result in a different disposition of the case. Local Rule 7.1(g)(3). In this case Plaintiff's' motion for reconsideration merely presents the same issues ruled upon by the court and fails to demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties have been misled. Case No. 07-14461 Honorable John Corbett O'Meara ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's' August 4, 2008 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. s/John Corbett O'Meara United States District Judge Date: January 22, 2009 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of record on this date, January 22, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/William Barkholz Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?