McKelvey v. United States Army, Secretary of

Filing 33

ORDER denying 32 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES N. McKELVEY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 07-14538 PETE GEREN, SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY, Defendant. ________________________________/ Hon. John Corbett O'Meara ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Before the court is Defendant's motion for reconsideration of this court's April 1, 2009 order denying Defendant's motion for summary judgment. Pursuant to L.R. 7.1(g)(2) (E.D. Mich. Sept. 8, 1998), no response was ordered and no oral argument was heard. The standard for granting motions for reconsideration is as follows: Generally, and without restricting the court's discretion, the court will not grant motions for rehearing or reconsideration which merely present the same issues ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication. The movant shall not only demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties have been misled but also show that correcting the defect will result in a different disposition of the case. LR 7.1(g)(3). Having filed a motion for reconsideration that presents the same issues ruled upon by the court, Defendant has failed to demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties have been misled. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's April 13, 2009 motion for reconsideration is DENIED. s/John Corbett O'Meara United States District Judge Date: July 22, 2009 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of record on this date, July 22, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/William Barkholz Case Manager -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?