Bell v. Ludwick

Filing 24

ORDER denying 22 Motion for Certificate of Appealability; and Application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES BELL, #201585, Petitioner, CASE NO. 5:09-CV-14423 HONORABLE JOHN CORBETT O’MEARA v. NICK LUDWICK, Respondent. / ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s motion for a certificate of appealability and his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal regarding the Court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The Court, however, denied a certificate of appealability and denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in its opinion and order denying the petition. The Court finds no reason to reconsider that decision. A motion for reconsideration which presents issues already ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication, will not be granted. See Hence v. Smith, 49 F. Supp. 2d 547, 550 (E.D. Mich. 1999); Czajkowski v. Tindall & Assoc., P.C., 967 F. Supp. 951, 952 (E.D. Mich. 1997). Petitioner has not met his burden of showing a palpable defect by which the Court has been misled or his burden of showing that a different disposition must result from a correction thereof, as required by Local Rule 7.1(h)(3). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s motion and application. s/John Corbett O’Meara United States District Judge Date: February 29, 2012 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of record on this date, February 29, 2012, using the ECF system and/or ordinary mail. s/William Barkholz Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?