Berry v. Ford Motor Company
Filing
108
ORDER denying 107 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JOSEPH J. BERRY,
Case No. 11-10569
Plaintiff,
Honorable John Corbett O’Meara
v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY,
Defendant.
/
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
This matter came before the court on plaintiff Joseph J. Berry's April 27, 2015 motion for
reconsideration of the court's April 14, 2015 Opinion and Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for
Partial Summary Judgment and Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Pursuant to
Local Rule 7.1 (h)(2), no response was ordered and no oral argument was heard.
Generally, and without restricting the court's discretion, the court will not grant
motions for rehearing or reconsideration that merely present the same issues ruled
upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication. The movant must
not only demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties and other
persons entitled to be heard on the motion have been misled but also show that
correcting the defect will result in a different disposition of the case.
LR 7.1(h)(3).
In this case Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration "merely present[s] the same issues ruled
upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication."
Plaintiff has failed to
“demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties . . . have been misled.”
Accordingly, the court must deny the motion.
ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's April 27, 2015 motion for reconsideration is DENIED.
s/John Corbett O'Meara
United States District Judge
Date: May 15, 2015
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on
this date, May 15, 2015, using the ECF system.
s/William Barkholz
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?