Pierson et al v. Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc et al

Filing 51

ORDER granting 46 Motion to Continue Stay. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION RANDALL PIERSON, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 12-10176 Hon. John Corbett O’Meara v. DHL HOLDINGS USA, INC., et al., Defendants. _______________________________/ RANDALL PIERSON, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 12-14393 Hon. John Corbett O’Meara v. DR. JEFFREY LAWLEY and SAMANTHA MINEHART, jointly and severally, Defendants. _______________________________/ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS TO CONTINUE STAY Before the court are Plaintiffs’ motion to continue the stay in these cases. The parties stipulated to a stay pending the Sixth Circuit’s issuance of a decision in Jackson v. Sedgwick Claims Mgmt. Servs., 731 F.3d 556 (6th Cir. 2013). The Sixth Circuit issued an en banc opinion in Jackson on September 24, 2013. The plaintiffs in Jackson have filed a petition for certiorari, which is pending. Plaintiffs seek to continue the stay in these cases until the Supreme Court makes a decision on the petition or issues an opinion on the merits. Given that Jackson likely controls here, the court finds that justice and judicial economy are best served by continuing the stay until the Supreme Court rules. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motions are GRANTED and the above cases are STAYED until the U.S. Supreme Court denies certiorari in Jackson or, if certiorari is granted, until the Court issues a decision on the merits. s/John Corbett O’Meara United States District Judge Date: March 4, 2014 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on this date, March 4, 2014, using the ECF system. s/William Barkholz Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?