Lundy v. Pontiac, City of et al

Filing 7

ORDER of Partial Dismissal re 1 Complaint, filed by Charles Lundy. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CHARLES LUNDY, Case No. 12-10965 Plaintiff, Honorable John Corbett O’Meara v. CITY OF PONTIAC, et. al., Defendants. / ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL Plaintiff Charles Lundy filed a 12-count complaint in this court alleging seven causes of action arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the United States Constitution. An additional five causes of action allege state law claims: Count VII, malicious prosecution; Count VIII, assault and battery; Count IX, false arrest and/or false imprisonment; Count X, intentional infliction of emotional distress; and Count XI, gross negligence. Although Plaintiff’s causes of action arising under federal statutes are cognizable in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, the remaining allegations present claims based solely on state law. This court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law claims in order to avoid jury confusion. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c); United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715 (1966); and Padilla v. City of Saginaw, 867 F. Supp. 1309 (E.D. Mich. 1994). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Counts VII, VIII, IX, X, and XI are DISMISSED. s/John Corbett O'Meara United States District Judge Date: June 7, 2012 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on this date, June 7, 2012, using the ECF system. s/William Barkholz Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?