Aaron v. Tyluki et al
Filing
73
ORDER Regarding Consent for Magistrate Judge. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JEFFREY AARON,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 12-14866
v.
JOHN TYLUKI, et al.,
Hon. John Corbett O’Meara
Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen
Defendants.
_________________________/
ORDER REGARDING CONSENT
FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE
In the interest of the prompt and efficient adjudication of this case, it is
ordered that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28
U.S.C. § 636(c), to have a Magistrate Judge conduct all further proceedings.
If both parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for
Defendants must, within two weeks of the date of this order, file a fully executed
Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, a
copy of which is attached to this order (and is also available in fillable format at
https://www.mied.uscourts.gov/PDFFiles/Notice_Consent_Ref_MJ_RE.pdf).
If the form is submitted, the court will enter a reference order and all
proceedings will be conducted before the Magistrate Judge. Any appeal of the
Magistrate Judge’s decision would be taken directly to the United States Court of
Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
If either party does not consent, Defendants must file a notice advising the
court that the parties do not consent within two weeks of the date of this order. Do
not disclose the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties
may withhold consent without negative consequences.
SO ORDERED.
s/John Corbett O’Meara
United States District Judge
Date: March 3, 2016
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the
parties of record on this date, March 3, 2016, using the ECF system and/or
ordinary mail.
s/William Barkholz
Case Manager
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?