Leaphart v. Robinson

Filing 9

ORDER denying 8 Motion for relief from judgment. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION KIRK LEAPHART, Plaintiff, Case No. 12-15618 v. Hon. John Corbett O’Meara DAVID S. ROBINSON, JR., Defendant. _________________________/ ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT Before the court is Plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment. The court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint on January 18, 2013, after reviewing it pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court concluded that Plaintiff failed to allege facts sufficient to overcome Defendant’s judicial immunity. Plaintiff seeks reconsideration, contending that Defendant, a 36th District Judge, is not immune because he acted “in the complete absence of all jurisdiction.” See Stern v. Mascio, 262 F.3d 600, 607 (6th Cir. 2001). However, Plaintiff’s allegations indicate that he disagrees with Judge Robinson’s application of the law, not that the judge acted in the complete absence of all jurisdiction. See id. (“[S]imply exceeding the limits of one’s jurisdiction will not eliminate immunity, because many courts are courts of limited jurisdiction regularly called upon to resolve unsettled points of law relating to the contours of their own jurisdiction. . . . Even grave procedural errors or acts taken when no statute purports to confer on the court the authority purportedly exercised will not deprive a judge of judicial immunity.”). Because Plaintiff cannot overcome Defendant’s judicial immunity, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment is DENIED. s/John Corbett O'Meara United States District Judge Date: June 6, 2013 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of record on this date, June 6, 2013, using the ECF system and/or ordinary mail. s/William Barkholz Case Manager -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?