Van Heck v. St. Clair, County of et al
Filing
24
OPINION AND ORDER granting 18 Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ROGER VAN HECK,
Case No. 13-11377
Plaintiff,
Honorable John Corbett O’Meara
v.
ST. CLAIR COUNTY, JOHN TOMLINSON, ST.
CLAIR COUNTY JUDICIARY, and MERRY V.
PACK,
Defendants.
/
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ DECEMBER 13, 2013 MOTION TO DISMISS OR
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
This matter came before the court on the December 13, 2013 Motion to Dismiss or for
Summary Judgment filed by defendants St. Clair County, St. Clair County Judiciary and John
Tomlinson . Plaintiff Roger Van Heck filed a response January 3, 2014; and Defendants filed a
reply brief January 23, 2014. Plaintiff filed a supplemental brief January 27, 2014. Pursuant to the
court’s December 19, 2013 order, the motion will be determined without oral argument.
Plaintiff Roger Van Heck filed a complaint in this court alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. §
1983 against St. Clair County; its judiciary; Judge John D. Tomlinson, one of its circuit court judges;
and Merry V. Pack, Plaintiff's ex-wife. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants violated his civil rights
during his child support case, over which Judge Tomlinson most recently presided.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
There is no legal entity known as "St. Clair County judiciary." Assuming Plaintiff's claims
are against St. Clair County Circuit Court, he fails to allege any actions or inactions against the
court; rather, Plaintiff's claims are premised on Judge Tomlinson's decision to enforce an agreement
Plaintiff had entered into with his ex-wife. Therefore, defendant St. Clair County judiciary is
entitled to dismissal.
Plaintiff's claims against St. Clair County consist of Judge Tomlinson's judicial decisions. The
circuit court is an independent, constitutionally-created office separate from St. Clair County. The
County has no control over the circuit court; therefore, the County, too, is entitled to dismissal.
Plaintiff claims defendant Judge Tomlinson violated his civil rights by enforcing an order to
which Plaintiff had previously consented. However, Judge Tomlinson is to be afforded absolute
judicial immunity for decisions or actions taken in his judicial capacity. See Bradley v. Fischer, 80
U.S. 335, 347 (1872). A judge will not be deprived of immunity because the action he/she took was
in error, was done maliciously or was in excess of his/her authority. Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S.
349, 356 (1978). The only exception to judicial immunity applies to acts taken in the "clear absence
of all jurisdiction." Id. In this case, the Michigan Legislature has granted circuit courts jurisdiction
over matters involving paternity and child support. Therefore, Judge Tomlinson is entitled to
absolute immunity.
ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' December 13, 2013 motion to dismiss or for
summary judgment is GRANTED.
s/John Corbett O'Meara
United States District Judge
Date: February 6, 2014
2
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of record
on this date, February 6, 2014, using the ECF system and/or ordinary mail.
s/William Barkholz
Case Manager
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?