UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NINE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED SEVENTY DOLLARS IN U.S. CURRENCY ($9,970.00)
ORDER granting 24 Motion to Strike and Request for Entry of Default Judgment and Final Order of Forfeiture. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Case No. 13-11967
Honorable John Corbett O’Meara
NINE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED
SEVENTY DOLLARS IN U.S. CURRENCY
Defendant in rem.
ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT'S FEBRUARY 19, 2014
MOTION TO STRIKE AND REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT
AND FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE
This matter came before the court on the government's February 19, 2014 Motion to Strike
Purported Claim Filed by Deon Powell and Request for Entry of Default Judgment and Final Order
of Forfeiture. Claimant Deon Powell filed a response March 4, 2014; and the government filed a
reply brief April 3, 2014. The order entered an order February 20, 2014, notifying the parties that
the motion would be determined without oral argument.
The government filed its complaint in this case May 2, 2013, alleging that the defendant
currency constituted proceeds or facilitating property involved in illegal drug trafficking and subject
to forfeiture under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6). Ultimately, Deon Powell filed a claim for the currency.
The government argues that Powell lacks the statutory standing required to proceed in this forfeiture
action and further requests entry of default judgment against Powell and all other persons and
entities, resulting in a final order of forfeiture of the defendant currency.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
The Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 ("CAFRA") and the Supplemental Rules
govern judicial forfeiture actions arising from a federal statute. In order to pursue a claim, both
Article III standing and statutory standing are required. United States v. Vehicle 2007 Mack Dump
Truck, 680 F. Supp. 2d 822 (E.D. Mich. 2010). Article III standing is satisfied when a claimant
demonstrates "a legally cognizable interest" in the defendant currency. One 2001 Cadillac Deville
Sedan, 335 F. Supp. 2d 769, 772 ((E.D. Mich. 2004). For statutory standing, a claimant must strictly
comply with the Supplemental Rules. Mack Dump Truck, supra, at 822.
Pursuant to Rule G(5)(a), the claim must provide enough detail to identify how the claimant
obtained possession of the claimed currency. United States v. $39,557.00, More or Less, in U.S.
Currency, 683 F. Supp. 2d 335, 339-40 (D.N.J. 2010). Additional details sufficient to support a
claim may include the following: a description of the person or persons from whom the purported
claimant received the claimed property, the date(s) and place(s) of receipt, and a description of the
transaction(s) that generated the claimed property. United States v. $134,750.00 in U.S. Currency,
2010 WL 1741359, *3 (D. Md. 2010).
In this case Powell's purported claim states merely that family and friends put money together
for him so he could buy a house, that the majority of the money came from a former love interest,
and that he had been putting the money away for four years. These cursory statements, however,
are inadequate to support a claim because they lack the required details under Rule G(5)(a). As a
result, Powell lacks statutory standing to challenge the forfeiture; and the court will strike his claim
under Rule G(8) of the Supplemental Rules.
When a claim is stricken in a forfeiture proceeding and the claimant lacks standing to oppose
the forfeiture, default judgment is appropriate. United States v. $5,730.00, 109 Fed. Appx. 712, 71315 (6th Cir. 2004). In this case, the government has complied with the notice requirements of civil
forfeiture, and no other person or entity has filed a claim as required by 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(4)(A).
Accordingly, the government is entitled to default judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that Deon Powell's claim is STRICKEN, and default judgment is
ENTERED against him.
It is further ORDERED that the default judgment IS EXTENDED to all other persons and
s/John Corbett O'Meara
United States District Judge
Date: May 6, 2014
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of record
on this date, May 6, 2014, using the ECF system and/or ordinary mail.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?