Wiseley v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Filing 22

ORDER Adopting 21 Report and Recommendation to Grant the Commissioner's 13 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (TMcg)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Deborah Sue Wiseley, Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cv-11626 v. Judith E. Levy United States District Judge Commissioner of Social Security, Mag. Judge David R. Grand Defendant. ________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [21] TO GRANT THE COMMISSIONER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [13] This is a Social Security disability appeal. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Grand’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 21), issued April 22, 2016, and recommending the Court grant the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. 13.) The parties were required to file specific written objections, if they had any, within 14 days of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. L.R. 72.1(d). No objections were filed. 1 The Report and Recommendation, being carefully detailed and rigorous in its review of the record and evaluation of the Commissioner’s arguments, is ADOPTED. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 13) is GRANTED; and The case is DISMISSED.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 17, 2016 Ann Arbor, Michigan s/Judith E. Levy JUDITH E. LEVY United States District Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court=s ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on June 17, 2016. s/Felicia M. Moses FELICIA M. MOSES Case Manager                                                              parties, by failing to object to the Report and Recommendation, have waived any further right of appeal. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).   1  The 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?