Rucker v. Hyatt Regency Dearborn et al

Filing 45

ORDER Granting Defendants' 44 Motion for Order to Show Cause. Show Cause Response due by 7/6/2015. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (HMon)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Regina Rucker, ex rel. Estate of Jayvion Rucker-Todd, Case No. 14-cv-11684 Hon. Judith E. Levy Mag. Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk Plaintiff, v. Hyatt Regency Dearborn, et al., Defendants. ________________________________/ ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE [44] This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion for an order requiring non-party witness Cheneka Gardner to show cause why she should not be held in contempt for failing to appear for her deposition on June 15, 2015. (Dkt. 44.) Defendants issued a subpoena on May 21, 2015, and served Gardner by process server on May 28, 2015. (Dkt. 446, Ex. 5 to Defs.’ Mot.) Defendants served Gardner with a copy of their motion by certified mail. (Dkt. 44, Defs.’ Mot. ¶ 14.) Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(g) permits the issuing court to hold in contempt a person who has been served with a subpoena but “fails without 1 adequate excuse to obey the subpoena or an order related to it.” Accordingly, defendants’ motion (Dkt. 44) is GRANTED; and Cheneka Gardner is ORDERED to show cause, in writing, by Monday, July 6, 2015, why she should not be held in contempt for failing to appear for her June 15, 2015 deposition. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 22, 2015 Ann Arbor, Michigan s/Judith E. Levy JUDITH E. LEVY United States District Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on June 22, 2015. s/Holly Monda HOLLY MONDA, in the absence of FELICIA M. MOSES Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?