Rucker v. Hyatt Regency Dearborn et al
Filing
45
ORDER Granting Defendants' 44 Motion for Order to Show Cause. Show Cause Response due by 7/6/2015. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (HMon)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
Regina Rucker, ex rel. Estate of
Jayvion Rucker-Todd,
Case No. 14-cv-11684
Hon. Judith E. Levy
Mag. Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk
Plaintiff,
v.
Hyatt Regency Dearborn, et al.,
Defendants.
________________________________/
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE [44]
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion for an order
requiring non-party witness Cheneka Gardner to show cause why she
should not be held in contempt for failing to appear for her deposition
on June 15, 2015. (Dkt. 44.) Defendants issued a subpoena on May 21,
2015, and served Gardner by process server on May 28, 2015. (Dkt. 446, Ex. 5 to Defs.’ Mot.) Defendants served Gardner with a copy of their
motion by certified mail. (Dkt. 44, Defs.’ Mot. ¶ 14.)
Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(g) permits the issuing court to hold in contempt
a person who has been served with a subpoena but “fails without
1
adequate excuse to obey the subpoena or an order related to it.”
Accordingly, defendants’ motion (Dkt. 44) is GRANTED; and
Cheneka Gardner is ORDERED to show cause, in writing, by
Monday, July 6, 2015, why she should not be held in contempt for
failing to appear for her June 15, 2015 deposition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 22, 2015
Ann Arbor, Michigan
s/Judith E. Levy
JUDITH E. LEVY
United States District Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served
upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s
ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses
disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on June 22, 2015.
s/Holly Monda
HOLLY MONDA, in the absence
of FELICIA M. MOSES
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?