Hodges v. Corizon et al
Filing
32
ORDER Adopting 28 Report and Recommendation re 14 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Joshua A. Buskirk, P.A., Harriet A. Squier, M.D., corizon of michigan, Corizon, Aster Berhane, M.D., Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
SHAWN HODGES,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 14-11837
v.
Honorable John Corbett O’Meara
CORIZON; CORIZON OF MICHIGAN, f/k/a
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC.; HARRIET
A. SQUIER, M.D.; ASTER BERHANE, M.D.;
JOSHUA A. BUSKIRK, P.A.; DANIEL A.
HEYNS; and GEORGE PRAMSTALLER,
Defendants.
/
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE GRAND’S
FEBRUARY 6, 2015 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter came before the court on Defendants' February 13, 2015 objections to Magistrate
Judge David Grand's February 6, 2015 Report and Recommendation.
The court, pursuant to Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(B), and LR 72.1(E.D. Mich. March 1, 2010), has reviewed Magistrate Judge Grand's
report and recommendation as well as Defendants' objections. After conducting a de novo review,
the court accepts the magistrate judge's report and recommendation as the court's findings and
conclusions. It is noted that the report and recommendation included defendant Corizon of
Michigan, formerly known as Prison Health Services, Inc., in its designation of "Corizon
Defendants." Therefore, Magistrate Judge Grand's recommendation applies to that defendant as
well.
It is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Grand’s February 6, 2013 report and
recommendation is ADOPTED.
It is further ORDERED that Defendants' June 16, 2015 motion to dismiss portions of
Plaintiff's amended complaint is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
Date: March 30, 2015
s/John Corbett O'Meara
United States District Judge
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on
this date, March 30, 2015, using the ECF system.
s/William Barkholz
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?