Limron v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Filing 20

ORDER 19 Magistrate Judge Grand's Adopting Report and Recommendation on Defendant's 11 Motion for Summary Judgment - Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (FMos)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Matthew Limron, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 14-cv-12890 Judith E. Levy United States District Judge Commissioner of Social Security, Mag. Judge David R. Grand Defendant. ________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE GRAND’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [19] ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [11] This is a Social Security appeal. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Grand’s thorough and thoughtful Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 19) recommending the Court grant defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 11), issued June 13, 2016. The parties were required to file specific written objections within 14 days of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. L.R. 72.1(d). No objections were filed. Accordingly, and on review of the Report and Recommendation, The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 19) is ADOPTED; Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 11) is GRANTED; and The findings of the Commissioner are ADOPTED and this case is DISMISSED.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 30, 2016 Ann Arbor, Michigan s/Judith E. Levy JUDITH E. LEVY United States District Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on June 30, 2016. s/Felicia M. Moses FELICIA M. MOSES Case Manager parties, by failing to object to the Report and Recommendation, have waived any further right of appeal. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).   2 1   The

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?