Hicks v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Filing
26
ORDER Adopting 25 Report and Recommendation for 14 , 17 Motions for Summary - Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (FMos)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
Susan Hicks,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 14-cv-14111
Hon. Judith E. Levy
Mag. Judge Anthony P. Patti
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
________________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
[25] ON THE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[14, 17]
This is a Social Security appeal. Before the Court is Magistrate
Judge Patti’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 25) recommending the
Court deny plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 14) and
grant defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
(Dkt. 17.)
The
parties were required to file specific written objections within fourteen
days of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d). No
objections were filed. Accordingly, and on review of the Report and
Recommendation,
The Report and Recommendation is adopted. Plaintiff’s motion for
summary judgment (Dkt. 14) is denied.
Defendant’s motion for
summary judgment (Dkt. 17) is granted. The Commissioner of Social
Security’s decision is affirmed, and the case is dismissed.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 5, 2016
Ann Arbor, Michigan
s/Judith E. Levy
JUDITH E. LEVY
United States District Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served
upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s
ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses
disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on May 5, 2016.
s/Felicia M. Moses
FELICIA M. MOSES
Case Manager
The parties, by failing to object to the Report and Recommendation, have waived
any further right of appeal. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir.
1981).
1
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?