Wassim M. Younes, M.D., P.L.C. et al v. Burwell et al

Filing 12

ORDER denying 11 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION WASSIM M. YOUNES, M.D., R.Ph., and WASSIM M. YOUNES, M.D., P.L.C., Case No. 15-11225 Plaintiffs, Honorable John Corbett O’Meara v. SYLVIA M. BURWELL, et. al., Defendants. / ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' APRIL 3 2015 EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION This matter came before the court on Plaintiffs’ April 3, 2015 Emergency Motion for Reconsideration. No response was filed, and no oral argument was heard. Local Rule 7.1(h)(2). Plaintiffs seek seek reconsideration of the court's April 2, 2015 Opinion and Order Denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Dismissing Case. Generally, and without restricting the court's discretion, the court will not grant motions for rehearing or reconsideration that merely present the same issues ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication. The movant must not only demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties and other persons entitled to be heard on the motion have been misled but also show that correcting the defect will result in a different disposition of the case. LR 7.1(h)(3). In this case Plaintiffs' emergency motion for reconsideration "merely present[s] the same issues ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication." Plaintiffs have failed to “demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties . . . have been misled.” Accordingly, the court must deny the motion. ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs' April 3, 2015 Emergency Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Date: April 13, 2015 s/John Corbett O'Meara United States District Judge I hereby certify that on April 13, 2015 a copy of this order was served upon counsel of record using the Court's ECF system. s/William Barkholz Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?