St. Ann v. McLean et al
Filing
42
ORDER Granting as Unopposed Defendant's 36 Motion to Take Deposition--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DAVID ST. ANN,
Plaintiff
v.
Case No. 5:15-CV-11770
District Judge Judith Levy
Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti
TODD MCLEAN, et al.,
Defendants.
___________________________________/
ORDER GRANTING AS UNOPPOSED DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
TAKE PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION (DE 36)
Pending is Defendants’ November 21, 2016 motion to depose pro se
Plaintiff. (DE 36.) Permission of the Court to take the deposition is required under
Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2)(B) because Plaintiff is incarcerated. Plaintiff has not
responded to the motion and the time for doing so under LR 7.1 has expired. The
motion therefore may be granted as unopposed.
Thus, upon the reading and filing of Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Take
Plaintiff’s Deposition Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(B), and
otherwise, being fully advised in the premises; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND
ADJUDGED that Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Take Plaintiff’s Deposition
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(B) (DE 36) is hereby
GRANTED AS UNOPPOSED, and Defendants shall be permitted to take the
deposition of the Plaintiff for all purposes allowed by the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure. Said deposition may occur either in person, by telephone, or via video
teleconference, at Defendants’ option and consistent with the requirements and
needs of Plaintiff’s place of incarceration.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 14, 2016
s/Anthony P. Patti
Anthony P. Patti
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on
December 14, 2016, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail.
s/Michael Williams
Case Manager for the
Honorable Anthony P. Patti
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?