Herrera v. Sanchez et al
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Motion Hearing set for 2/18/2016 at 2:00 PM on 11 Motion to Dismiss before District Judge Judith E. Levy) - Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (FMos)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jose Luis Herrera,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 15-cv-12862
Hon. Judith E. Levy
Mag. Judge R. Steven Whalen
Juan Jose Sanchez, Pascual
Guzman, Rogelio Lopez, John Doe
Owner, and El Cabrito LLC,
Defendants.
________________________________/
OPINION AND ORDER
Plaintiff Jose Luis Herrera alleges in his complaint that
defendants are all citizens of Michigan, “[p]laintiff is a citizen of
Mexico[,] and . . . the value of the matter in controversy exceeds
$75,000,” and thus the Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 to
hear his state-law claims. (See Dkt. 1 at 1-2.) However, plaintiff also
alleges that he “is currently a resident of Wayne County.” (See id. at 1.)
The Court therefore ordered plaintiff to show cause by December 7,
2015, as to why the case should not be dismissed for lack of subject-
matter jurisdiction. See generally Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of
Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994) (“It is to be presumed that a cause lies
outside [the federal courts’] limited jurisdiction . . . , and the burden of
establishing the contrary rests upon the party asserting jurisdiction.”)
(internal citations omitted); Boegh v. EnergySolutions, Inc., 772 F.3d
1056, 1064 (6th Cir. 2014) (same).
Plaintiff filed a timely response, alleging that plaintiff “is a citizen
of Mexico, and has no legal status within the United States, as he has
not been granted permanent residency or other immigration relief
within the United States.” (See Dkt. 18 at 1-2.) According to plaintiff,
he purchased real property in Michigan and lived here “for a period,”
but “did return to Mexico, and to date has not obtained legal status in
the United States.”
(See id. at 2.)
Plaintiff alleges that he “is not
currently in the prices [sic] of applying for or obtaining permanent
residency in the United States.” (See id.) Since 2008, the time plaintiff
provides he returned to Mexico, he has allegedly started “working,
living, and otherwise making a life for himself in Mexico.” (See id.)
Plaintiff argues he was thus “domiciled in Mexico at the time the
complaint was filed” on August 12, 2015. (See id.) Plaintiff’s response
2
to the show-cause order is sufficient to establish the existence of
subject-matter jurisdiction at this time.1
Section 1332 provides, in relevant part:
(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all
civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the
sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and
is between . . . (1) Citizens of different States; [and] (2)
citizens of a State and citizens of a foreign state, except that
the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under
this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and
citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully
admitted for permanent residence in the United States and
are domiciled in the same State[.]
28 U.S.C. § 1332(a).
The issue is whether plaintiff falls under the
exception to § 1332(a)(2), in which diversity is defeated for “citizens of a
State and . . . subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for
permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the
same State.”
“Aliens who have obtained lawful permanent resident status
under the immigration laws (i.e., aliens with green cards) are
considered aliens admitted for permanent residence” under § 1332(a)(2).
Fleming v. Fed Ex Freight East, Inc., No. 06-cv-11275, 2006 U.S. Dist.
“The existence of subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time, by any
party, or even sua sponte by the court itself.” Superior Bank, FSB v. Boyd (In re
Lewis), 398 F.3d 735, 739 (6th Cir. 2005). If it later comes to light that plaintiff was
domiciled in Michigan at the time of the complaint, the case will be dismissed.
1
3
LEXIS 49097, at *3 (E.D. Mich. June 23, 2006).
However, “aliens
admitted to the United States on any lesser status are not.” Paasewe v.
Anjana Samadder, M.D., Inc., No. 04-cv-724, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
19870, at *9 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 13, 2005); see also Kato v. Cty. of
Westchester, 927 F. Supp. 714, 716 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) (“[I]t is clear that
[§ 1332(a)] affects only the status of those aliens with ‘green cards’—
admitted to the United States for permanent residence. Thus, aliens
present in this country on any lesser status will still be considered
aliens, able to invoke alienage jurisdiction against a citizen of a state.”)
(quoting 1 JAMES WM. MOORE
ET AL.,
MOORE’S FEDERAL PRACTICE
¶ 0.75[1.-5], at 800.56 (1991)) (alteration in original).
Plaintiff alleges that he is a citizen of Mexico, “to date has not
obtained legal status in the United States,” and “is not currently in the
prices [sic] of applying for or obtaining permanent residency in the
United States.”
(See Dkt. 18 at 1-2.)
Based on these allegations,
plaintiff is not a “permanent resident” within the exception to
§ 1332(a)(2). The Court thus has subject-matter jurisdiction, even if
plaintiff is currently a “resident” of Wayne County, Michigan. (See Dkt.
4
1 at 1.) Defendant Juan Jose Sanchez’s motion to dismiss, (see Dkt. 11),
is set for hearing on February 18, 2016, at 2:00 PM.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 9, 2015
Ann Arbor, Michigan
s/Judith E. Levy
JUDITH E. LEVY
United States District Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served
upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s
ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses
disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on December 9, 2015.
s/Felicia M. Moses
FELICIA M. MOSES
Case Manager
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?