Pollington v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc. et al
ORDER granting 13 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (WBar)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Civil Action No. 16-10812
Honorable John Corbett O’Meara
Magistrate Judge David R. Grand
G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS (USA), INC.
and KEVIN BAKER,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS (USA) INC.’S
MOTION TO COMPEL 
Before the Court is a Motion to Compel responses to its First Set of Interrogatories and
Requests for Production of Documents, filed by Defendant G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc.
(“G4S”) on September 14, 2016. . Plaintiff Denise Pollington has not filed a response.
On April 25, 2016, G4S served Pollington with its First Set of Interrogatories and
Requests for Production of Documents. [Id. at 5]. Pollington failed to respond to G4S’s written
discovery requests by the May 28, 2016 deadline, and has failed to meet other agreed-upon
deadlines for production of the discovery. [Id. at 5-6]. This apparently owes to the death of
Plaintiff’s counsel’s mother, and related personal matters [Id.].
In its instant motion, G4S requests an order from the Court compelling Pollington to
serve G4S with her responses to its First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of
Documents, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 37 and E.D. Mich L.R. 7.1 and 37.1. [Id. at 1, 8-9].
On September 16, 2016, the Court held a telephonic conference with counsel, and it was
agreed that Pollington could have until September 26, 2016, to produce the requested discovery.
Counsel also agreed to reschedule Pollington’s deposition, which is necessary to give G4S time
to review Pollington’s discovery responses.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant G4S’s Motion to Compel  is
GRANTED. Pollington shall serve G4S with her responses to its First Set of Interrogatories and
Requests for Production by September 26, 2016.
Counsel and the parties shall work
cooperatively to reschedule Pollington’s deposition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 16, 2016
Ann Arbor, Michigan
s/David R. Grand
DAVID R. GRAND
United States Magistrate Judge
The parties’ attention is drawn to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), which provides a period of
fourteen (14) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order within which to file objections
for consideration by the district judge under 28 U.S. C. §636(b)(1).
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record
and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to their respective email or First Class
U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on September 16, 2016.
s/William Barkholz for Eddrey O. Butts
EDDREY O. BUTTS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?