Davis-Bey v. City of Warren et al
Filing
70
ORDER Adopting 69 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (SBur)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
Bobby DeAndre Davis-Bey,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 16-cv-11707
Judith E. Levy
United States District Judge
City of Warren, et al.,
Mag. Judge Mona K. Majzoub
Defendants.
________________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [69]
On January 16, 2018, Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub issued
a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 69) recommending that the Court
grant defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
(Dkt. 43.)
The
parties were required to file specific written objections within 14 days of
service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. L.R. 72.1(d). No objections
were filed. The Court has nevertheless thoroughly reviewed the Report
and Recommendation.
Plaintiff was arrested for interference with a lawful arrest, and
received a trial based on charges stemming from that arrest. The Court
adopts the reasoning of the Report and Recommendation insofar as it
determines that there is no constitutional right to interfere with a
lawful arrest, regardless of whether the person interfering with the
arrest is also filming the arrest.
The Court otherwise adopts the
reasoning and result of the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly,
The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 69) is ADOPTED;
Defendants’
motion
for
summary
judgment
(Dkt.
43)
is
GRANTED; and
This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 14, 2018
Ann Arbor, Michigan
s/Judith E. Levy
JUDITH E. LEVY
United States District Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served
upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s
ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses
disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on February 14, 2018.
s/Shawna Burns
SHAWNA BURNS
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?