Brown v. Rivard et al
Filing
21
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 19 Request filed by Trent Brown Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
TRENT BROWN,
Case No. 5:16-cv-12362
Judge Judith Levy
Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti
Plaintiff,
v.
S. RIVARD, et al.,
Defendants.
___________________________________/
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION (DE 19)
Judge Levy has referred pretrial matters to me for resolution in this pro se
prisoner civil rights case. (DE 6.) Pending now is Plaintiff’s October 27, 2016
motion for additional time to respond to Defendants’ motion for a more definite
statement, which is based on the illegibility of portions of Plaintiff’s Complaint.
(DE 16.) Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and is purportedly required to
hand write his pleadings in this action, the Court will leniently GRANT the motion
without Defendants being required to file a response. Plaintiff shall respond to the
motion for a more definite statement by December 8, 2016.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
1
Plaintiff
asks for a twenty-four day extension on page one of his motion and a
fourteen day extension on page eight of the motion. The Court has generously
given Plaintiff a twenty-four day extension. However, Plaintiff is cautioned that
the Court will not grant additional extensions of time to respond to the motion for a
more definite statement.
1
Dated: November 1, 2016
s/Anthony P. Patti
Anthony P. Patti
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record
on November 1, 2016, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail.
s/Michael Williams
Case Manager for the
Honorable Anthony P. Patti
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?