Arnold v. Hutchinson et al

Filing 36

ORDER Adopting 35 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (SBur)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Earl Arnold, Plaintiff, Case No. 16-cv-13403 v. Judith E. Levy United States District Judge Craig Hutchinson et al., Mag. Judge Mona K. Majzoub Defendants. ________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [35] Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub’s Report and Recommendation recommending the Court GRANT defendant Hutchinson’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A), and DENY AS MOOT defendant Hutchinson’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). The parties were required to file specific written objections within 14 days of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. L.R. 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The parties, by failing to object to the Report and 1 Recommendation, have waived any further right of appeal. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). The Court has reviewed this case in its entirety, and finds that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is well founded. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 35) is ADOPTED. Defendant Hutchinson’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A) is GRANTED. (Dkt. 30.) Defendant Hutchinson’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is DENIED AS MOOT. (Dkt. 25.) IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 27, 2018 Ann Arbor, Michigan s/Judith E. Levy JUDITH E. LEVY United States District Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on March 27, 2018. s/Shawna Burns SHAWNA BURNS Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?