Dixon v. Ford Motor Company et al

Filing 46

ORDER Adopting Magistrate Judge Patti's 45 Report and Recommendation on Defendant St. John Providence Health System's Unopposed 36 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (SBur)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Eunice LaShawn Dixon, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-cv-14124 Hon. Judith E. Levy Mag. Judge Anthony P. Patti Ford Motor Company, et al., Defendants. ________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE PATTI’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [45] ON DEFENDANT ST. JOHN PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS [36] Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Patti’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 45) recommending the Court grant defendant St. John Providence Health System’s unopposed motion to dismiss (Dkt. 36), issued October 10, 2017. The parties were required to file specific written objections within 14 days of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. L.R. 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The Court has nevertheless thoroughly reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and concurs in the reasoning and result. Accordingly, The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 45) is ADOPTED; St. John Providence Health System’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. 36) is GRANTED; and St. John Providence Health System is hereby DISMISSED from this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 14, 2017 Ann Arbor, Michigan s/Judith E. Levy JUDITH E. LEVY United States District Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on November 14, 2017. s/Shawna Burns SHAWNA BURNS Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?