Stroud v. Brewer

Filing 8

ORDER denying 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

MIAH DANIELLE STROUD, #936182,
Petitioner,
CASE NO. 5:17-CV-13132
HONORABLE JOHN CORBETT O’MEARA

v.
SHAWN BREWER,
Respondent.
__________________________________/

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
Michigan prisoner Miah Danielle Stroud (“Petitioner”) has filed a pro se petition for a writ
of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 asserting that she is incarcerated in violation of her
constitutional rights. This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s motion for appointment of
counsel. In support of the motion, Petitioner states that she is unable to afford counsel, that her
ability to litigate is hampered by her imprisonment, that her case involves complex legal and factual
issues, and that she lacks legal training.
Petitioner has no absolute right to be represented by counsel on federal habeas review. See
Abdur-Rahman v. Michigan Dept. of Corrections, 65 F.3d 489, 492 (6th Cir. 1995); see also Wright
v. West, 505 U.S. 277, 293 (1992) (citing Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987)).
“‘[A]ppointment of counsel in a civil case is . . . a matter within the discretion of the court. It is a
privilege and not a right.’” Childs v. Pellegrin, 822 F.2d 1382, 1384 (6th Cir. 1987) (quoting United
States v. Madden, 352 F.2d 792, 793 (9th Cir. 1965)).
In this case, Petitioner has submitted her habeas petition, but Respondent has not yet filed
an answer to the petition or the state court record. Those materials are due in March, 2018.

Petitioner’s request is therefore premature. Moreover, an initial review of the petition indicates that
the appointment of counsel is not necessary at this time. The Court will bear in mind Petitioner’s
request if, upon a more detailed review of all of the relevant documents, the Court determines that
appointment of counsel is necessary. Petitioner need not file an additional motion concerning this
issue. Accordingly, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Petitioner’s motion for
appointment of counsel.
IT IS ORDERED.
s/John Corbett O’Meara
United States District Judge

Date: September 28, 2017

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of record
on this date, September 28, 2017, using the ECF system and/or ordinary mail.

s/William Barkholz
Case Manager

2