Doe et al v. Thoen et al

Filing 19

OPINION and ORDER Dismissing Pro Se Plaintiffs. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (SBur)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION E.V. Doe, by Next Friend N.C. Doe, J.P. Doe, by Next Friend J.A.P. Doe, E.R. Doe, by Next Friend J.R. Case No. 17-cv-14010 Doe, J.B. Doe, by Next Friend M.B. Doe, and J.M. Doe, by Next Friend Judith E. Levy H.M. Doe, United States District Judge Plaintiffs, Mag. Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford v. Shirley Thoen, an Individual, and Port Huron Area School District, Defendants. ________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE PLAINTIFFS On January 22, 2019, the Court ordered pro se plaintiffs J.P. Doe, by Next Friend J.A.P. Doe and J.B. Doe, by Next Friend M.B. Doe to inform the Court, individually and in writing by Friday, February 22, 2019 whether they wished to pursue their case or were voluntarily dismissing the case. (Dkt. 18.) The Order indicated if plaintiffs failed to file a response, the Court would assume that pro se plaintiffs are voluntarily dismissing their case. (Id.) Plaintiffs did not file any document by February 22, 2019, and as of today, have not filed anything in response to the Court’s order. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, plaintiffs J.P. Doe, by Next Friend J.A.P. Doe and J.B. Doe, by Next Friend M.B. Doe’s case is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 5, 2019 Ann Arbor, Michigan s/Judith E. Levy JUDITH E. LEVY United States District Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on March 5, 2019. s/Shawna Burns SHAWNA BURNS Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?