Jentlie v. R1 RCM, Inc.

Filing 25

ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 11 Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JANYL JENTLIE,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 5:17-cv-14073
District Judge John Corbett O’Meara
Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti

R1 RCM, INC. and
NATHAN AMORUSO,
Defendants.
___________________________________/
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT R1
RCM, INC.’S EMERGENCY MOTION TO STRIKE, OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, TO SEAL, CERTAIN ALLEGATIONS IN PLAINTIFF’S
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DE 11)
This matter is before the Court for consideration of Defendant R1 RCM,
Inc.’s above described motion, as well as the related response and reply. (DEs 11,
13, 14.) The parties, through counsel, came before me for a hearing on this matter
on February 8, 2018. For the reasons stated on the record, Defendant’s motion
(DE 11) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows (with
reference to paragraphs in the First Amended Complaint (DE 10)):


Paragraph 33 may remain.



Paragraph 34 is largely stricken, but Plaintiff may rephrase the
paragraph to generally allege that Defendant bragged in a text
to Plaintiff about having had sex with a “fellow employee,”
without reference to specific sexual acts or people.



Paragraph 35 is stricken in its entirety.



Paragraph 36 is stricken in its entirety.



Paragraph 37 is stricken in its entirety.



Paragraph 38 is largely stricken, but Plaintiff may rephrase the
paragraph to generally allege that Defendant texted Plaintiff
about his desire to engage in sexual activity with her, without
reference to specific sexual acts.



Paragraph 40 is largely stricken, but Plaintiff may rephrase the
paragraph to generally allege that Defendant texted Plaintiff
about another sexual escapade, including oral sex, but without
further detail.



Paragraph 41 may remain.



Paragraph 42 is stricken in its entirety.



Paragraph 43 is stricken in its entirety.



Paragraph 44 may remain.



Paragraph 45 is stricken in its entirety.



Paragraph 46 may remain, except Plaintiff must remove the
introductory clause.



Paragraph 47 may remain.

No later than Friday, February 16, 2018, Plaintiff SHALL file her second
amended complaint (consistent with the above ruling), along with the exhibits
previously sealed by the Court. (See DE 9.) Once the second amended complaint

2

with sealed exhibits is filed, the Clerk of the Court will STRIKE both the original
complaint (DE 1) and the first amended complaint (DE 10).
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 8, 2018

s/Anthony P. Patti
Anthony P. Patti
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record
on February 8, 2018, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail.
s/Michael Williams
Case Manager for the
Honorable Anthony P. Patti

3