Rogers v. Snyder et al
Filing
80
OPINION and ORDER Dismissing Certain Defendants, Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
In re Flint Water Cases.
________________________________/
Judith E. Levy
United States District Judge
This Order Relates To:
Rogers v. Snyder, et al.
Case No. 18-10713
________________________________/
OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN DEFENDANTS
On December 15, 2019, the Court issued an order to show cause in
individual Flint Water Cases as to why certain Defendants should not be
dismissed. (ECF No. 69.) The specific Defendants relevant here are: Jeff
Wright,1 Daniel Wyant,2 Dayne Walling,3 Nick Lyon,4 Edward Kurtz,5
Wright was dismissed as a Defendant in Carthan v. Snyder, 384 F. Supp. 3d
802, 860 (E.D. Mich. 2019), and again in Walters v. Flint, No. 17-10164, 2019 WL
3530874, at *39 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 2, 2019).
2 Wyant was dismissed as a Defendant in Carthan, 384 F. Supp. at 859, and
again in Walters, 2019 WL 3530874, at *16.
3 Walling was dismissed as a Defendant in Carthan, 384 F. Supp. at 860, and
again in Walters, 2019 WL 3530874, at *39.
4 Lyon was dismissed as a Defendant in Walters, 2019 WL 3530874, at *35.
5 Kurtz was dismissed as a Defendant in Carthan, 384 F. Supp. at 860, and
was not named as a Defendant in Walters, 2019 WL 3530874, at *3 n.5.
1
Liane Shekter Smith,6 and Eden Wells.7 Plaintiff responded to the order
to show cause on January 1, 2020 (ECF No. 71), arguing that Defendants
Wright, Lyon, and Shekter Smith should not be dismissed. For the
reasons that follow, the Court now dismisses Defendants Wright, Wyant,
Walling, Lyon, Kurtz, and Wells.
Defendants Wright and Lyon
Plaintiff argues that Defendants Wright and Lyon should not be
dismissed so that Plaintiff can preserve arguments raised in other
related cases in which Defendants Wright and Lyon were dismissed,
including Carthan v. Snyder, No. 16-cv-10444, Walters v. Flint, No. 17cv-10164, and Brown v. Snyder, No. 18-10726. In its order to show cause,
the Court clarified that agreeing to dismiss these Defendants “will not
waive Plaintiffs’ right to appeal this Court’s earlier decisions as to that
Defendant.” (ECF No. 69, PageID.253.) Plaintiff’s arguments with
respect to Defendants Lyon and Wright are preserved, and Lyon and
Shekter Smith is still a Defendant in Carthan, 384 F. Supp. at 859, but was
dismissed in Walters on statute of limitations grounds. Walters, 2019 WL 3530874, at
*11–*13.
7 Wells was not named as a Defendant in Walters, 2019 WL 3530874, at *2 n.4.
6
2
Wright are now dismissed for the reasons set forth in the Court’s prior
opinions.
Defendant Shekter Smith
Plaintiff, in arguing why Defendant Shekter Smith should not be
dismissed, partially relies on arguments raised by Co-liaison Counsel in
Carthan. (Carthan, No. 16-cv-10444, ECF No. 1035.) The Court will
decide the issues raised by Co-liaison Counsel at a later date, at which
time the Court will also adjudicate the dismissal of Defendant Shekter
Smith in this case. The Court does not dismiss Defendant Shekter Smith.
Defendants Wyant, Walling, Kurtz, and Wells
Plaintiff did not show cause as to why Wyant, Walling, Kurtz, or
Wells should not be dismissed. Accordingly, these Defendants are
dismissed.
Defendants Lyon, Wright, Wyant, Walling, Kurtz, and Wells are
DISMISSED. Defendant Shekter Smith is not dismissed
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 30, 2020
Ann Arbor, Michigan
s/Judith E. Levy
JUDITH E. LEVY
United States District Judge
3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served
upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s
ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses
disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on March 30, 2020.
s/William Barkholz
WILLIAM BARKHOLZ
Case Manager
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?