Visner v. Michigan State Police et al

Filing 32

ORDER Adopting 31 Report and Recommendation, Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar)

Download PDF
Case 5:19-cv-11466-JEL-APP ECF No. 32, PageID.136 Filed 05/06/22 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Theodore J. Visner, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 19-11466 Judith E. Levy United States District Judge Michigan State Police Commander, Michigan Intelligence Operations Mag. Judge Anthony P. Patti Center, the MIOC Commander, the Law Enforcement Information Network, and the LEIN Director, Defendants. ________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [31] Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Anthony Patti’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 31) recommending that the Court dismiss pro se Plaintiff Theodore J. Visner’s complaint against the Defendants remaining in this case, the Michigan State Police Commander, the Michigan Intelligence Operations Center (MIOC), the MIOC Commander; the Law Enforcement Information Network (LEIN), and the LEIN Director (ECF No. 1). The parties were required to file specific written objections, if any, within fourteen days of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The Court has Case 5:19-cv-11466-JEL-APP ECF No. 32, PageID.137 Filed 05/06/22 Page 2 of 2 nevertheless carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concurs in the reasoning and result. Accordingly, The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 31) is ADOPTED and the complaint is DISMISSED.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 6, 2022 Ann Arbor, Michigan s/Judith E. Levy JUDITH E. LEVY United States District Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court s ECF System to their respective email or first-class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on May 6, 2022. s/William Barkholz WILLIAM BARKHOLZ Case Manager By failing to object to the Report and Recommendation, the parties have forfeited any further right of appeal. See United States v. Wandahsega, 924 F.3d 868, 878 (6th Cir. 2019); see also Berkshire v. Beauvais, 928 F.3d 520, 530 (6th Cir. 2019). 1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?