Visner v. Michigan State Police et al

Filing 32

ORDER Adopting 31 Report and Recommendation, Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar)

Case 5:19-cv-11466-JEL-APP ECF No. 32, PageID.136 Filed 05/06/22 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
Theodore J. Visner,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 19-11466
Judith E. Levy
United States District Judge

Michigan State Police Commander,
Michigan Intelligence Operations
Mag. Judge Anthony P. Patti
Center, the MIOC Commander, the
Law Enforcement Information
Network, and the LEIN Director,
Defendants.
________________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [31]
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Anthony Patti’s Report and
Recommendation (ECF No. 31) recommending that the Court dismiss pro
se Plaintiff Theodore J. Visner’s complaint against the Defendants
remaining in this case, the Michigan State Police Commander, the
Michigan

Intelligence

Operations

Center

(MIOC),

the

MIOC

Commander; the Law Enforcement Information Network (LEIN), and
the LEIN Director (ECF No. 1). The parties were required to file specific
written objections, if any, within fourteen days of service. Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The Court has

Case 5:19-cv-11466-JEL-APP ECF No. 32, PageID.137 Filed 05/06/22 Page 2 of 2

nevertheless carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation and
concurs in the reasoning and result. Accordingly,
The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 31) is ADOPTED and
the complaint is DISMISSED.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 6, 2022
Ann Arbor, Michigan

s/Judith E. Levy
JUDITH E. LEVY
United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served
upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court s
ECF System to their respective email or first-class U.S. mail addresses
disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on May 6, 2022.
s/William Barkholz
WILLIAM BARKHOLZ
Case Manager

By failing to object to the Report and Recommendation, the parties have
forfeited any further right of appeal. See United States v. Wandahsega, 924 F.3d 868,
878 (6th Cir. 2019); see also Berkshire v. Beauvais, 928 F.3d 520, 530 (6th Cir. 2019).
1

2