Williams v. Grand Rapids Public Library
Filing
58
MOTION for summary judgment under authority of Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b) and (c) by defendant Grand Rapids Public Library; (Ophoff, Daniel)
<![CDATA[
Williams v. Grand Rapids Public Library
Doc. 58
Case 1:06-cv-00635-RHB-JGS
Document 58
Filed 07/16/2007
Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DONALD WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v GRAND RAPIDS PUBLIC LIBRARY, Defendant. /
DONALD WILLIAMS 44 ½ S. Division., Apt. 37 Grand Rapids, MI 49503 DANIEL A. OPHOFF (P23819) Assistant City Attorney Attorney for Defendant 300 Monroe Ave., NW, Suite 620 Grand Rapids, MI 49503 (616) 456-4023
Case No. 1:06-CV-0635 Hon. Robert Holmes Bell Chief, U.S. District Judge
/ DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT UNDER AUTHORITY OF FED.R.CIV.P. 56(b) AND (c) Defendant, by and through its attorney, Daniel A. Ophoff, Assistant City Attorney for the City of Grand Rapids, moves for summary judgment in this matter under authority of Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b) and (c) in support of its motion, Defendant affirmatively states there are no genuine issues of material fact and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on all claims alleged in Plaintiff's complaint for the reasons stated in Defendant's Brief in Support of this motion. Respectfully submitted, Dated: July 16, 2007 By: /s/ Daniel A. Ophoff DANIEL A. OPHOFF (P23819) Assistant City Attorney Attorney for Defendant 300 Monroe Ave., NW Grand Rapids, MI 49503 (616) 456-4023
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
