Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. v. USA Truck, Inc.

Filing 33

ORDER denying 31 plaintiff's motion for reconsideration; signed by Senior Judge Richard Alan Enslen (Senior Judge Richard Alan Enslen, blb)

Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. v. USA Truck, Inc.

Doc. 33

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION _____________________ PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., L.P., Case No. 1:07-CV-437 Plaintiff, v. USA TRUCK, INC., ORDER Defendant. ____________________________________/ This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.'s Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's January 2, 2008 Judgment. Pursuant to Western District of Michigan Local Civil Rule 7.4(a), reconsideration is appropriate only when the movant "demonstrate[s] a palpable defect by which the Court and the parties have been mislead . . . [and] that a different disposition must result from the correction thereof." Plaintiff argues the Court misapplied the application of Mich. Comp. Laws § 500.3106(2), although it does not cite any new authority or advance any new arguments in support of this proposition. The Court finds that no palpable error has been shown nor has it been shown that a different disposition should result. Simply put, the previous Judgment remains a proper disposition of the case for the reasons explained therein. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.'s Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. No. 31) is DENIED. /s/ Richard Alan Enslen RICHARD ALAN ENSLEN SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Hon. Richard Alan Enslen

DATED in Kalamazoo, MI: February 8, 2008

Dockets.Justia.com