Boulding #472529 v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al

Filing 85

ORDER denying objection to the report and recommendation 77 as untimely; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TIMOTHY BOULDING, Plaintiff, v CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES et al., Defendants. _______________________________/ Case No. 1:08-cv-576 HON. JANET T. NEFF ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's October 16, 2009, Objection to the Report and Recommendation (Dkt 77), in which Plaintiff delineates various objections to the magistrate's report and recommendation. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on September 18, 2009, recommending that defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted and this action be dismissed (Dkt 74). Any objection to the report and recommendation must have been filed and served within ten (10) days of service of the report on the plaintiff.1 See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No timely objections were filed. This Court therefore entered an Opinion and Order approving and adopting the recommendation on October 9, 2009, and entered a Judgment dismissing the case (Dkt 75). 1 The time for filing objections has since been changed to fourteen (14) days. Plaintiff did not move to extend the time to file objections, nor has he provided a reason why he untimely filed his objections to the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Objection to the Report and Recommendation (Dkt 77) is DENIED as untimely. Date: January 20, 2010 /s/ Janet T. Neff JANET T. NEFF United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?