Alexander v. United States of America

Filing 8

ORDER denying 7 motion for order ; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, kad)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JERMAIN MARVIN ALEXANDER, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. / Case No. 1:09-CV-889 (Criminal Case No. 1:06:CR:312) HON. GORDON J. QUIST ORDER DENYING FREE TRANSCRIPT The court has received Movant, Jermain Alexander's, Motion for (Sentencing) Transcript "pursuant to Rule 15(c) of Federal Civil Judicial Procedure." The need of the transcript is "to supplement pending 2255 motion to better show this court as an exhibit to decide the issue's, [sic] to better show the case is not frivolous." Further, "Movant hopes his request to better show this court for his relief will be granted." This court notes that a transcript of the sentencing hearing has already been furnished to movant. Movant's sentences were affirmed by the Sixth Circuit on October 10, 2008. United States v. Alexander, 543 F.3d 819 (6th Cir. 2008). The Supreme Court denied certiorari on May 8, 2009. A movant in a § 2255 matter has no right to a free transcript. Dorsey v. United States, 333 F.2d 1015 (6th Cir. 1964). Fees for transcripts furnished in proceedings brought under § 2255 will be paid by the United States only if "the trial judge or a circuit judge certifies that the suit or appeal is not frivolous and that the transcript is needed to decide the issue presented by the suit or appeal." 28 U.S.C. § 753(f). This court cannot in good conscience certify that any suit by this Movant is not frivolous and that (another) transcript is needed to decide the issue. Therefore, the Motion For Transcript (docket no. 7) is DENIED. Dated: December 2, 2009 /s/ Gordon J. Quist GORDON J. QUIST UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?