Taylor #361170 v. Howes et al

Filing 113

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 109 ; denying Plaintiff's motions for entry of default judgments [91, 92, 93]; denying Defendants Lacy and Hillis's motion to dismiss 95 ; denying Defendant Heebsh's motion to dismiss 96 ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

MARCUS TAYLOR, #361170,
Plaintiff,
File No: 1:10-CV-94
v.
HON. ROBERT HOLMES BELL
TERRILYNN HILLIS, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
On November 28, 2011, Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that Plaintiff’s motions for entry of default
judgments (Dkt. Nos. 91, 92, 93), Defendants Lacy and Hillis’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No.
95), and Defendant Heebsh’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 96) be denied. (Dkt. No. 109,
R&R.) The R&R was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed, and the
deadline for doing so has expired. The Court has reviewed the matter and concludes that the
R&R correctly analyzes the issues and makes a sound recommendation. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the November 28, 2011, R&R (Dkt. No. 109) is
APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motions for entry of default judgments
(Dkt. Nos. 91, 92, 93) are DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Lacy and Hillis’s motion to dismiss
(Dkt. No. 95) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Heebsh’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No.
96) is DENIED.

Dated: December 19, 2011

/s/ Robert Holmes Bell
ROBERT HOLMES BELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2