Beck v. Plainwell, City of et al
Filing
144
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 142 ; granting motion for judgment on the pleadings 130 ; only the allegations of retaliation against Defendant Bomar, asserted in paragraphs ##102-04 of Plaintiff's complaint, and the allegations of retaliation against Defendant Varley, asserted in paragraph #86, remain; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
BARBARA L. BECK,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 1:11-cv-735
v.
HON. JANET T. NEFF
CITY OF PLAINWELL, et al.,
Defendants.
_______________________________/
ORDER
This is a civil action brought by a pro se litigant. On October 30, 2012, the Magistrate Judge
issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt 142), recommending that Defendant’s Erik J. Wilson,
William Bomar, John Varley and Rickey L. Updike’s Renewed Motion for Judgment on the
Pleadings (Dkt 130) be granted. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties.
No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt 142) is APPROVED and
ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Erik J. Wilson, William Bomar, John
Varley and Rickey L. Updike’s Renewed Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt 130) is
GRANTED for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation. Only the allegations of
retaliation against Defendant Bomar, asserted in paragraphs ##102-04 of Plaintiff’s complaint, and
the allegations of retaliation against Defendant Varley, asserted in paragraph #86, remain.
Date: November 19, 2012
/s/ Janet T. Neff
JANET T. NEFF
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?