Williams #206224 v. Palmer
Filing
6
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 4 , dismissing with prejudice petition for writ of habeas corpus, and denying certificate of appealability ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DWAYNE CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS,
Petitioner,
File No. 1:11-CV-1232
v.
HON. ROBERT HOLMES BELL
CARMEN PALMER,
Respondent.
/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
AND DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Dwayne Christopher Williams’s
objections to the Magistrate Judge’s January 19, 2012, Report and Recommendation
(“R&R”) recommending that Petitioner’s § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus be
dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, because
it plainly appears that the petition is barred by the one-year statute of limitations found in 28
U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). (Dkt. No. 4, R&R.) Petitioner filed objections to the R&R on February
7, 2012. (Dkt. No. 5.)
This Court is required to make a de novo determination of those portions of the R&R
to which objection has been made and may accept, reject, or modify any or all of the
Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b). Although the Magistrate Judge’s R&R is reviewed de novo, this Court must review
the state court proceedings consistent with the standards set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
Petitioner objects to the R&R based on his contention that he “did in fact file all
proper appropriate appeals of rights well within such time limitation.” Even if Petitioner’s
appeals were timely, Petitioner has not challenged the Magistrate Judge’s determination that
his § 2255 petition was not filed within one year of June 28, 2010, when the Michigan
Supreme Court denied leave to appeal. Petitioner has not raised any meritorious challenges
to the Magistrate Judge’s finding that his § 2255 petition is time-barred. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s objections to the Report and
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 5) are OVERRULED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the January 19, 2012, R&R (Dkt. No. 4) is
APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus
(Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
Dated: September 6, 2012
/s/ Robert Holmes Bell
ROBERT HOLMES BELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?