Umbarger #251202 v. Michigan, State of et al

Filing 24

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 23 , granting Defendants' motion to dismiss 15 ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOHN UMBARGER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:12-cv-603 HON. ROBERT HOLMES BELL STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION On September 17, 2013, Magistrate Judge Scoville issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Dkt. No. 23) recommending that Defendants Booker, Caruso, Combs, Granholm, Heyns, McKeon, Michigan Department of Corrections, Michigan (State of), Sampson, and Snyder’s motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Dkt. No. 15) be granted and further recommending that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Atterberry and Hofbauer be dismissed without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). No objections have been filed, and the deadline for doing so has expired. The Court has reviewed the matter and concludes that the R&R correctly analyzes the issues and makes a sound recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s September 7, 2013, R&R (Dkt. No. 23) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 15) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims for Declaratory Judgment are DISMISSED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Booker, Caruso, Combs, Granholm, Heyns, McKeon, Michigan Department of Corrections, Michigan (State of), Sampson, and Snyder are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Atterberry and Hofbauer are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Dated: October 8, 2013 /s/ Robert Holmes Bell ROBERT HOLMES BELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?