Tibble v. Credit Solutions of America

Filing 4

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1 ; the transfer made by Debtors to Defendant Credit Solutions of America is avoided. Defendant Credit Solutions of America shall pay Plaintiff Thomas R. Tibble $6,721.78, together with interest at the statutory rate and costs of $293. ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION THOMAS R. TIBBLE, Plaintiff, File No. 1:13-CV-137 v. HON. ROBERT HOLMES BELL CREDIT SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, Defendant. / ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION On January 18, 2013, United States Bankruptcy Judge Jeffrey R. Hughes issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending the Court avoid the transfer made by Debtors to Defendant Credit Solutions of America pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 548, and enter a money judgment in favor of Plaintiff Thomas R. Tibble and against Defendant Credit Solutions of America in the amount of $6,721.78, together with interest at the statutory rate and costs of $293, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 550. (Dkt. No. 1, Attach. 1.) No objections have been filed, and the objections period provided by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9033(b)(c) has elapsed. The Court has reviewed the matter and concludes that the R&R correctly analyzes the issues and makes a sound recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the January 18, 2013, R&R (Dkt. No. 1, Attach. 1) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the transfer made by Debtors to Defendant Credit Solutions of America is AVOIDED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Credit Solutions of America pay Plaintiff Thomas R. Tibble $6,721.78, together with interest at the statutory rate and costs of $293. Dated: February 28, 2013 /s/ Robert Holmes Bell ROBERT HOLMES BELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?