Miller v. Fiedler

Filing 21

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 4 , 17 ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, sdb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM MILLER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:13-CV-566 HON. ROBERT HOLMES BELL WOLF FIEDLER, Defendant. ____________________________________/ ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION On December 5, 2013, Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction be denied without prejudice, but that his motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) be granted. (Dkt. No. 17, R&R.) Objections were due within fourteen days of service of the R&R, but the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time until January 22, 2014, to file objections. (Dkt. No. 20, Order.) No objections have been filed, and the extended deadline for doing so has expired. The Court has reviewed the matter and concludes that the R&R correctly analyzes the issues and makes a sound recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s December 5, 2013, R&R (Dkt. No. 17) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 4) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. To the extent Defendant moves to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, the motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. To the extent Defendant moves to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), the motion is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED. Date: January 24, 2014 /s/ Robert Holmes Bell ROBERT HOLMES BELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?