Crehan v. Maiden Lane LLC et al
Filing
35
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 29 ; denying 11 motion to remand; granting 9 motion to dismiss; dismissing Plaintiff's claims against Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and John Does 1-99; and terminating this matter; Judgment to issue; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MATTHEW J. CREHAN,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 1:13-cv-657
v.
HON. JANET T. NEFF
MAIDEN LANE LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
_______________________________/
ORDER
This is a civil action involving a pro se litigant. Maiden Lane Defendants filed a Motion to
Dismiss (Dkt 9), and Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand (Dkt 11). The matter was referred to the
Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on December 17, 2013, recommending
that this Court deny Plaintiff’s motion to remand, grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss, dismiss
Plaintiff’s claims against Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and John Does 1-99 for failure
to timely effect service, and terminate this matter. The Report and Recommendation was duly served
on the parties. No timely objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt 29) is APPROVED
and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Dkt 11) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Maiden Lane Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt 9)
is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation and John Does 1-99 are DISMISSED for failure to timely effect service.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is TERMINATED.
A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order.
Dated: February 6, 2014
/s/ Janet T. Neff
JANET T. NEFF
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?