Smith #267009 v. Heyns et al

Filing 17

ORDER REGARDING PARTIAL DISMISSAL AND PARTIAL SERVICE: dismissing Defendants Craig, Boykin, Cobb, Ortiz, Worthy, Samuels, Van Marke, Blount, Lipscomb, Ryan, Tina Bommaritto, Andrea Bommaritto, Graham, Green, Skinner, Evans, Wayne County Jail, Detroit Police Department, Northern District/9th Precinct, Lincoln Park Police Department, Palmer, Stewart, Russell, RMI Health Care Services, LRF Health Care Services, Kinder, Lambert, and Deerden, Dickerson, Irby, Berghuis, Vialpando, Verbencouer and Heyns; the Clerk is to arrange for service of this order and the complaint; motion for order to proceed to trial 13 is DENIED; motion for order [14-2] is DENIED; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, kw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DERRICK LEE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:13-cv-694 Honorable Paul L. Maloney DANIEL H. HEYNS et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ ORDER FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL and PARTIAL SERVICE In accordance with the Opinion filed this date: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s action against Defendants Craig, Boykin, Cobb, Ortiz, Worthy, Samuels, Van Marke, Blount, Lipscomb, Ryan, Tina Bommaritto, Andrea Bommaritto, Graham, Green, Skinner, Evans, Wayne County Jail, Detroit Police Department, Northern District/9th Precinct, Lincoln Park Police Department, Palmer, Stewart, Russell, RMI Health Care Services, LRF Health Care Services, Kinder, Lambert, and Deerden, Dickerson, Irby, Berghuis, Vialpando, Verbencouer and Heyns be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A, and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall forward the amended complaint to the U.S. Marshals Service, which is authorized to mail a request for waiver of service to Defendant Alford in the manner prescribed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2). If waiver of service is unsuccessful, summons shall issue and be forwarded to the U.S. Marshals Service for service under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Alford shall file an appearance of counsel (individual defendants may appear pro se if they do not have counsel) within 21 days of service or, in the case of a waiver of service, 60 days after the waiver of service was sent. Until so ordered by the Court, no defendant is required to file an answer or motion in response to the amended complaint, and no default will be entered for failure to do so. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(1). After Defendant Alford has filed an appearance, proceedings in this case will be governed by the Court’s Standard Case Management Order in a Prisoner Civil Rights Case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Motion to Proceed to Pretrial Proceedings, Preliminary Hearings, Discovery, Jury Selection and Trial on Claims Filed by Plaintiff for Civil Rights Violations Contained Within Criminal Trial and Civil Rights Complaint Filed Within the Federal Court on Defendant Listed Within the Complaint” (docket #13) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Motion Asking this Court to Enter an Order to Allow Plaintiff the Opportunity to Have this Court Proceed on Claim That Come Within the Jurisdiction of the Western District and to Have the Claims That Come under Eastern Jurisdiction to Be Settled in the Eastern District by Having the Case Transferred to the Eastern District Propr to this Court Entering a Final Decision Saying the Case Is Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction Based upon the Claims Being Filed Properly” (docket #14-2) is DENIED. Dated: October 16, 2013 /s/ Paul L. Maloney Paul L. Maloney Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?