Rivera #239567 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al

Filing 35

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 34 ; Defendants' motion for summary judgment 24 is granted; Defendants MDOC, Heyns, Finco, Martin and Wolfe are dismissed; Plaintiff may proceed on the claims outlined in this order ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION WILSON RIVERA, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:14cv214 v. Hon. Robert J. Jonker MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. / ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties on August 24, 2015. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, filed August 24, 2015, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as the opinion of the court. IT IS ORDERED that defendants’ motion for summary judgment (docket #24) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants MDOC, Heyns, Finco, Martin and Wolfe are DISMISSED from this action. Plaintiff may proceed on the following claims: (1) that defendant Stephens rejected his incoming mail on December 10, 2012; (2) that defendant White refused to sign plaintiff’s disbursement form to order a book; (3) that defendant White attempted to intimidate plaintiff into tearing up his Religious Preference form indicating membership in MSTA-1928; and (4) that defendant White improperly advised mailroom staff to reject plaintiff’s incoming mail in December, 2012. /s/ Robert J. Jonker ROBERT J. JONKER CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: September 15, 2015.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?