King #527662 v. Rutgers et al

Filing 87

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 74 re 85 ; Defendants' motion for summary judgment 85 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

DAYON KING,
Plaintiff,

Case No. 1:14-CV-1019

v.

Hon. Gordon J. Quist

AARON RUTGERS, et al.,
Defendants.
/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States
Magistrate Judge in this action on April 5, 2016, which recommended that the Court grant in part
and deny in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. No objections have been filed
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge filed April 5, 2016 (ECF No. 85) is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No.
74) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as outlined in the Report and Recommendation.

Dated: May 6, 2016

/s/ Gordon J. Quist
GORDON J. QUIST
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE