Ryder v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 23

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 21 ; granting stipulation 22 ; granting corrected stipulation 20 ; terminating as moot stipulation 19 ; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION SUSAN LYNN RYDER, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:15-cv-46 v. HON. JANET T. NEFF COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. / ORDER APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This is a civil action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The parties filed a Stipulation of Consent to EAJA Fees (Dkt 19), which was corrected the same day (Dkt 20). The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation (R & R) on January 18, 2017, recommending that this Court grant the corrected stipulation, and terminate the original stipulation as moot. The R & R was duly served on the parties. On January 20, 2017, the parties filed a Stipulation of Consent to Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt 22), requesting the approval of the R & R without the necessity of the fourteen-day objection period. The Court having reviewed the above filings: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation of Consent to Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt 22) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt 21) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Corrected Stipulation of Consent to EAJA Fees (Dkt 20) is GRANTED for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Stipulation of Consent to EAJA Fees (Dkt 19) is TERMINATED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant pay Plaintiff attorney fees in the amount of four thousand, two hundred eighty-seven dollars and fifty cents ($4,287.50). Dated: January 23, 2017 /s/Janet T. Neff JANET T. NEFF United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?