Sango #252200 v. Burns et al

Filing 119

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 117 re 102 : Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 102 is GRANTED and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION ROBERT D. SANGO, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:15-CV-356 v. Hon. Gordon J. Quist UNKNOWN BURNS, et al., Defendants. / ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Court has reviewed Magistrate Ellen Carmody’s June 27, 2017, Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court grant Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismiss the case in its entirety based on Plaintiff’s lack of exhaustion. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on Plaintiff on June 27, 2017. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, filed June 27, 2017 (ECF No. 117), is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 102) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.1 Dated: July 27, 2017 1 /s/ Gordon J. Quist GORDON J. QUIST UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Court notes that the Report and Recommendation was returned as Plaintiff failed to leave a forwarding address. (ECF No. 118.) Such failure is itself a violation of W.D. Mich. LCivR 41.1, justifying a dismissal for failure to prosecute the case.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?