Sango #252200 v. Burns et al

Filing 51

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 49 re 41 , 47 : Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 47 is GRANTED; Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED AS MOOT; case closed; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ROBERT D. SANGO, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:15-CV-365 v. Hon. Gordon J. Quist UNKNOWN BURNS, et al., Defendants. / ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Ray Kent’s August 1, 2017, Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court grant Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and deny Defendant’s motion for summary judgment as moot. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties on August 1, 2017. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the August 1, 2017, Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 49) is approved and adopted as the Opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (ECF No. 47) is GRANTED, and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 41) is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE based on Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute the case. This case is concluded. A separate judgment will enter. Dated: August 24, 2017 /s/ Gordon J. Quist GORDON J. QUIST UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?