Rayos #311171 v. Smith et al

Filing 8

ORDER REGARDING PARTIAL DISMISSAL and PARTIAL SERVICE;and denying 4 motion to appoint counsel; within 14 days, plaintiff shall file a copy of this order and sufficient additional copies of the complaint for service upon the remaining defendants; upon receipt of the copies, the Clerk is to arrange for service of this order and the complaint upon the remaining defendants; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, cmc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MARCOS RAYOS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:15-cv-1153 Honorable Paul L. Maloney WILLIE O. SMITH et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ ORDER FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL and PARTIAL SERVICE In accordance with the Opinion filed this date: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s action against Defendants Washington and Smith be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A, and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 4) will be DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in accordance with Administrative Order No. 03-029, the Clerk shall return to Plaintiff with a copy of this order one copy of the complaint and any exhibits. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in accordance with W.D. Mich. LCivR 10.4 and Administrative Order 03-029,1 Plaintiff shall, immediately upon receipt of this order, request that the prison 1 When service is to be made by the United States Marshal, as in this case, the Court’s local rules require litigants to provide sufficient copies of their documents for service when the documents are filed. make nine (9) copies of the complaint and exhibits for service upon Defendants Huss, Nevins, Thurby, Kelly, Ryske, Kerr, Sanders, Guiles, and Scott. Plaintiff is responsible for the cost of the copies. If Plaintiff does not have sufficient funds to pay for the copies, the Michigan Department of Corrections provides loans for legal copies. See MICH. DEP’T OF CORR., Policy Directive 05.03.116. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fourteen (14) days of this order, Plaintiff shall file with the Court the requisite number of copies of the complaint and exhibits along with a copy of this order OR an affidavit explaining why Plaintiff is unable to provide the requested copies within the fourteen-day period. Should the Court find that the prison failed to make copies upon Plaintiff's request, the Court will direct the Clerk to make such copies as may be necessary and to charge the Michigan Department of Corrections for the cost of copying at the Court’s usual rate of $.50 per page. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s failure to submit the requested copies within the time provided by the Court or an affidavit explaining why Plaintiff is unable to provide the requested copies may result in the dismissal of his action without prejudice by the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon receipt of the copies required by this order, the Clerk shall forward the complaint to the U.S. Marshals Service, which is authorized to mail a request for waiver of service to Defendants Huss, Nevins, Thurby, Kelly, Ryske, Kerr, Sanders, Guiles, and Scott in the manner prescribed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2). If waiver of service is unsuccessful, summons shall issue and be forwarded to the U.S. Marshals Service for service under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). W.D. Mich. LCivR 10.4. Under Administrative Order 03-029, Plaintiff was excused from providing additional copies of his complaint until the Court determined that service was warranted. -2- IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall reply to the complaint by way of answer, motion to dismiss, or motion for summary judgment within the time allowed by law. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2). Dated: December 1, 2015 /s/ Paul L. Maloney Paul L. Maloney United States District Judge -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?