Fuller v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing et al

Filing 193

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 192 ; Defendants Motions to Dismiss 99 , 103 , 115 are granted as to Counts 6 and 14 of the Corrected Second Amended Complaint. The remaining state law claims are remanded to the Allegan County Circuit Court based on the Court's decision not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (and award costs) 186 is denied; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION LARRY FULLER, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:16-cv-475 v. HON. ROBERT J. JONKER SHELL POINT MORTGAGE SERVICING, et al., Defendants. / ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action on September 6, 2017. (ECF No. 192). No objections have been filed under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 192) is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 99, 103, 115) are GRANTED as to Counts 6 and 14 of the Corrected Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 86). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s remaining state law claims as alleged in Counts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 15 of the Corrected Second Amended Complaint are REMANDED to the Allegan County Circuit Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c). This remand is based on the Court’s decision not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, and not on the basis of any improvident removal. So even though the state law claims are remanded, Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (and award costs) (ECF No. 186) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 26, 2017 /s/ Robert J. Jonker ROBERT J. JONKER CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?