Edmondson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
10
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 8 ; Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Commissioner of Social Security is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution and repeated failures to comply with the Court's orders and rules; this matter is TERMINATED; the Court discerns no good-faith basis for appeal ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JOSEPH EDMONDSON,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 1:16-cv-1095
v.
HON. ROBERT J. JONKER
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
__________________________________/
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States
Magistrate Judge in this action on May 15, 2017 (ECF No. 8). The Report and Recommendation was
duly served on the parties no later than May 23, 2017 (ECF No. 9). No objections have been filed
under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C). In fact, Plaintiff has filed a response concurring with the Report and
Recommendation’s proposed dismissal of this case (ECF No. 9).
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 8) is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant Commissioner of
Social Security is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution and repeated failures to
comply with the Court’s orders and rules.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is TERMINATED.
The Court discerns no good-faith basis for appeal of this matter. See McGore v.
Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 611 (6th Cir. 1997); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
Dated:
July 13, 2017
/s/ Robert J. Jonker
ROBERT J. JONKER
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?